1. 北卡罗来纳大学新闻与传播学院 NC 27599-3365
2. USA
纸质出版日期:2002,
扫 描 看 全 文
[1]赵心树.部分原因与因果关系的分类[J].济南大学学报(社会科学版),2002,{4}(03):18-24+91-92.
Zhao Xin - shu. Partial Causes and a Typology of Causal Relations[J]. Journal of University of Jinan(Social Science Edition), 2002,(3):18-24.
摘 要:人类关于因果关系的理解有一个缺陷
这限制了人们决策思维的合理与有效。在中国
这一思维缺陷部分地源于形式逻辑
特别是形式逻辑中关于假言推理的理论。传统形式逻辑中关于假言推理的理论把“条件”与“结论”的关系分成四种下
即充分、必要、充分必要条件(隐含的)非条件。传统的假言推理分类形成一个事实上的因果分类体系
把原因分为充分、必要、充分必要原固及(隐含的)非原固这四类。这一传统的因果关系分类遗漏了一个重要的原因类别——部分原因。这一遗漏可能部分地导致了思维、讨论、争辩、决策中的许多歧义、混乱与缺失。有鉴于此
笔者提出了一个新的因果分类体系
把原因分为充分、必要、充分必要、部分原固及非原因这五类。下一步的研究应当论证这一新体系的完整性
即它的包容性与互斥性
并在此基础上计算各类因果关系出现的概率。笔者认为
探讨这一问题直接目标在于给因果关系分类
而给因果关系分类是为了建立更为科学的决策思维方式。由于形式逻辑传统上不把因果关系或决策思维方法作为主要研究对象
所以
就其目标而言
所探讨的问题不属于形式逻辑的范畴。从某种意义上说
笔者是旨在思维方法、形式逻辑、科学方法论、决策科学以及各个涉及因果判断的实证学科等许多学科之间的一个跨领域
The understanding of human beings to causal relations has defects
which limts the rationaity and avail-ability of policy thinking. In China
the thinking defection is partly due to formal logic
especially
the theoryabout medus ponens. The theory about modus ponens in the traditional formal logic separates the relation ofcondition and result into four types: full conditions
essential conditions
full and essential condtions
andhidden condition. As a true system of causal relations takes shape
which separates causes into four types
such as full causes
essential causes
full and essential causes
and hidden causes. The traditional typology ofcausal relations loses partial causes
which may partly lead to a lot of different meanings
confusion and lacksof thought
discussion and policy. The author brings out a new system of typology of causal relations
whichseparates causes into five types as follows: full causes
essential causes
full and essential causes
partialcauses
and hidden causes. The next investigation is to expound and prove its completeness
which consists ofinclusion and alternative
and count the probability of all the kinds of causal relations. The author holds thatthe goal is to build more ecientific poicy - thinking mode. As the formal logic traditionally doesn’ t regardcausal relations or policy - thinking mode as major object of study
the paper doesn’ t belong to the category offormal logic. The author tries to pass through thinking methods
formal loglc
scientific methedology
policyscience and all the positive subjects related to causal judgment.
原因结果因果关系分类假言推理
原因结果因果关系分类假言推理
0
浏览量
584
下载量
14
CNKI被引量
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621
