济南大学 政法学院,山东 济南 250022
唐斌尧,博士,济南大学政法学院副教授,硕士生导师;
丛晓峰,济南大学政法学院教授。
纸质出版日期:2021-03-15,
扫 描 看 全 文
唐斌尧, 丛晓峰. 国家责任与个体自由:福利权利正当性之辩[J]. 济南大学学报(社会科学版), 2021,31(2):126-134.
Binyao TANG, Xiaofeng CONG. State Responsibility and Individual Freedom: Debate on the Justification of Welfare Rights[J]. JOURNAL OF UNIVERSITY OF JINAN (Social Science Edition), 2021,31(2):126-134.
福利权利已被确立为一种法律权利,但是它的性质与正当性问题依然受到广泛的讨论与质疑,有关的知识争论早已超越法律或法哲学的范畴,成为福利哲学、社会政策意识形态的核心问题之一。福利权利正当性问题的本质在于国家福利供给责任与个体自由之间的关系,这直逼社会政策研究的核心问题,对当前正迈入社会政策时代的中国而言,具有重要的理论和现实意义。对福利权利持反对或否定立场的主张可概括为后果论、社群价值论和个人自由权利论,辩护或肯定的主张则主要包括市场批判和校正论、公民身份论和积极自由论。本文认为,从福利的本质是扩展和实现个人实质自由的条件这一前提出发,福利权利的正当性证明需要解决以下三方面问题:福利能否成为权利;福利何以成为权利;福利权利如何得以保障。
Although welfare rights have been established as the legal right
its nature and legitimacy are still widely discussed and questioned. The debate has long gone beyond the scope of law or legal philosophy and has become one of the core issues of social policy ideology. The essence of the issue of welfare rights lies in the relationship between the state welfare supply responsibility and individual freedom
which is the core issue of social policy research. Whether for the Western welfare states or for China
which is currently entering the era of social policy
it has both important theoretical and practical significance. The claims against the welfare rights or the negative position can be summarized as the consequence theory
the community value theory and the individual freedom rights theory. The defense or positive claims mainly include market criticism and correction theory
citizenship theory and positive freedom theory. This article argues that from the premise that the essence of welfare is to expand and realize the conditions of individual substantive freedom
the justification of welfare rights needs to answer the following three questions: Whether welfare can become a right; How welfare can become a right; and How welfare rights can be guaranteed.
福利权利正当性国家责任实质自由
0
浏览量
635
下载量
5
CNKI被引量
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构