Comments on the Study of Denny’s China and Korea in Japanese Academia
返回论文页
|更新时间:2022-07-28
|
Comments on the Study of Denny’s China and Korea in Japanese Academia
封面论文
JOURNAL OF UNIVERSITY OF JINAN (Social Science Edition)Vol. 32, Issue 4, Pages: 63-77(2022)
作者机构:
1.聊城大学 历史文化学院,山东 聊城 252059
2.日本大学理工学部,日本 千葉 274-0081
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:K31/D833
Published:15 July 2022,
扫 描 看 全 文
LIheng ZHANG, Haiyan GUO. Comments on the Study of Denny’s China and Korea in Japanese Academia. [J]. JOURNAL OF UNIVERSITY OF JINAN (Social Science Edition) 32(4):63-77(2022)
DOI:
LIheng ZHANG, Haiyan GUO. Comments on the Study of Denny’s China and Korea in Japanese Academia. [J]. JOURNAL OF UNIVERSITY OF JINAN (Social Science Edition) 32(4):63-77(2022)DOI:
Comments on the Study of Denny’s China and Korea in Japanese Academia封面论文
when he served as a diplomatic adviser to the Korean government. He is the first person to interpret qualities of the suzerain-vassal relation between China and Korea from the perspective of international law
discriminate and analyze the differences between tributary state and vassal state from jurisprudence
indicate that Korea is Chinese tributary rather than vassal
emphasize that the tributary state is independent
promote the theories that China and Korea are separate
China and Korea are equal
and Korea is independent
expose and criticize that Qing government has no rights to interfere in the internal and diplomatic affairs of Korea
and affirm the legitimacy of the Korean pursuit of independence. Because his ideas were in line with the needs of Japan’s policy to invade Korea at that time
it was greatly sought after. And there appeared a relatively short period of “Denny’s fever” in Japan. With the outbreak of 1894-1895 Sino-Japanese War and Japan’s annexation of Korea
the study of Denny and China and Korea fell into a low ebb in Japan. Since the beginning of the 21
st
century
Denny and his
China and Korea
have once again become the research focus of the Japanese academia
and have achieved fruitful results. But there is room for further discussion in the research field and viewpoints on history.