Three Main Core Journals: What Can Replace Them? —— Dilemma of Academic Evaluation
返回论文页
|更新时间:2022-03-29
|
Three Main Core Journals: What Can Replace Them? —— Dilemma of Academic Evaluation
JOURNAL OF UNIVERSITY OF JINAN (Social Science Edition)Vol. 29, Issue 2, Pages: 5-25(2019)
作者机构:
《南京大学学报》编辑部,江苏 南京 210093
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:G236
Published:15 March 2019,
扫 描 看 全 文
Jian ZHU. Three Main Core Journals: What Can Replace Them? —— Dilemma of Academic Evaluation. [J]. JOURNAL OF UNIVERSITY OF JINAN (Social Science Edition) 29(2):5-25(2019)
DOI:
Jian ZHU. Three Main Core Journals: What Can Replace Them? —— Dilemma of Academic Evaluation. [J]. JOURNAL OF UNIVERSITY OF JINAN (Social Science Edition) 29(2):5-25(2019)DOI:
Three Main Core Journals: What Can Replace Them? —— Dilemma of Academic Evaluation
Academic communities and academic journals have conflict with evaluation agency for at least 20 years. They are too close to call because that evaluation agency has its own theoretical foundation and data support. Ranking lists represented by three main core journals have been admitted by executive power in fact. However
because of lacking professional ability
its theory
data
arithmetic and result all cannot hold up to closer inspection. Its ranking lists cause severe problems in academic evaluation practice. In current scientific research system
executive power cannot ignore the problems in academic evaluation practice caused by these ranking lists. However
executive power cannot abandon them in resource allocation and scientific research management. Therefore
the result is the dilemma of academic evaluation which causes great damage to scientific research. Clean up si wei and wu wei movement is the first practical step to rebuild academic evaluation system. The key is that if we can we find out replacement of three main core journals. In this background
the future choice of three main core journals producer is also worthy our attention.