"Sociological Imagination" and Research Paradigm Integration for Sociology of Education
返回论文页
|更新时间:2021-12-22
|
"Sociological Imagination" and Research Paradigm Integration for Sociology of Education
封面论文
JOURNAL OF UNIVERSITY OF JINAN (Social Science Edition)Vol. 31, Issue 3, Pages: 122-130(2021)
作者机构:
1.东莞理工学院 法律与社会工作学院,广东 东莞 523808
2.台湾师范大学 教育学系,台湾 台北 106
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:C913.4
Published:15 May 2021,
扫 描 看 全 文
Yanting ZHANG, Hongping ZHAO. "Sociological Imagination" and Research Paradigm Integration for Sociology of Education. [J]. JOURNAL OF UNIVERSITY OF JINAN (Social Science Edition) 31(3):122-130(2021)
DOI:
Yanting ZHANG, Hongping ZHAO. "Sociological Imagination" and Research Paradigm Integration for Sociology of Education. [J]. JOURNAL OF UNIVERSITY OF JINAN (Social Science Edition) 31(3):122-130(2021)DOI:
"Sociological Imagination" and Research Paradigm Integration for Sociology of Education封面论文
There are two orientations in the research for sociology of education: the micro paradigm and the macro paradigm. The former pays more attention to action
mostly represented by symbolic interactionism and ethnomethodology
emphasizing the study of micro-behavior in education. The latter pays more attention to structure
mostly represented by functionalism
neo-Marxism
structuralism and post-structuralism
and advocates a holistic explanation of the structure and function of education. However
when adopting the two paradigms
many researches either pay too much attention to the micro details or over emphasize the decisive power of the overall structure
thus failing to really integrate the micro and macro paradigms
let alone complete theoretical construction. Charles Wright Mills' "sociological imagination" is not only a kind of mental quality
but also a kind of research method. It emphasizes the idea of shuttling between different levels of macro theory and micro empirical materials
which provides a possible path for the integration of the macro and micro paradigms in research for sociology of education
and therefore has important methodological significance.