Beyond the Centrism of American Chinese Studies: Reflection on the Paradigms of Chinese Studies and Sinology
返回论文页
|更新时间:2021-12-22
|
Beyond the Centrism of American Chinese Studies: Reflection on the Paradigms of Chinese Studies and Sinology
JOURNAL OF UNIVERSITY OF JINAN (Social Science Edition)Vol. 31, Issue 3, Pages: 71-77(2021)
作者机构:
山东大学 国际汉学研究中心,山东 济南 250100
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:K207.8
Published:15 May 2021,
扫 描 看 全 文
Zengqiang REN. Beyond the Centrism of American Chinese Studies: Reflection on the Paradigms of Chinese Studies and Sinology. [J]. JOURNAL OF UNIVERSITY OF JINAN (Social Science Edition) 31(3):71-77(2021)
DOI:
Zengqiang REN. Beyond the Centrism of American Chinese Studies: Reflection on the Paradigms of Chinese Studies and Sinology. [J]. JOURNAL OF UNIVERSITY OF JINAN (Social Science Edition) 31(3):71-77(2021)DOI:
Beyond the Centrism of American Chinese Studies: Reflection on the Paradigms of Chinese Studies and Sinology
As far as the paradigm of overseas Chinese studies is concerned
the American Chinese Studies advocated by John King Fairbank after World War II are not the only representation. From the temporal perspective
in the occurrence period and the evolution of traditional Sinology
it has shown some characteristics of Chinese Studies. From a regional perspective
Soviet Russia and Japan in the early 20th century have concentrated more on the paradigm characteristics of Chinese Studies. To break through "American Centrism" is not to construct another center
but to put Sinology and Chinese Studies in the coordinates of a long period of history and more countries in the world
so as to present the respective characteristics
the causes of evolution and the future development trend of the two paradigms.